Contemporary World Politics-Part-3
-BY DR. ABDUL RUFF COLACHAL
The book “Contemporary World Politics” outlines the trends in international politics in many aspects.. This is the first part of many similar books on the subject. This book covers politics, economics, foreign policy matters, sports fixes, etc. The premises of argument is that Sept-11 was a hoax engineered by the inside rogues in USA under the guidance of CIA-Pentagon duo and Zionist elements deciding policies for Americans. The main objectives of Sept-11 included invasion of Islamizing Afghanistan, wage war on Islam, defaming it as a terrorist religion, occupation of energy rich nations, killing of Muslims in millions, looting the resources form Islamic world, control energy resources of Mideast and Central Asia, control the old Silk Road for trade,
Terrorism is caused by anti-Islamic forces. Anti-Muslimism and anti-Islamism are more dangerous than "terrorism" Global media today, even in Muslim nations, are controlled by anti-Islam rogue agencies. Fake democracies have zero-tolerance to any criticism of their anti-Muslim and other aggressive practices. Anti-Islamic forces are harming genuine interests of Muslims by employing Muslim agents.
Humanity has a right to know the truth.
USA against Denuclearization and Disarmament
US pretensions, double-speak and double-standards are characteristic of imperialism. It wants only the big powers to possesses nukes and does not want Iran to be a part of that system. It never asked nuke rouge states to stop more nukes and begin dismantling nuke infrastructures.
Humanity seeks a secured world free from nukes and wars. But big powers and their traditional military n and space rivalries deny the people of globe real chances for safety and security.
Although it criticizes Iran and North Korea on their legitimate nuke projects, USA is not at all serious about denuclearization and disarmament. Washington stalls al serious attempts by global nations to create a world free of nukes.
American opposition and lack of commitment to various international disarmament conventions are obstacles to advancing the issue of global disarmament.
To put it aptly, the US opposition to the protocol to the Biological Weapons Convention, its non-adherence to its commitments under the Chemical Weapons Convention to eliminate its arsenal by 2012, and efforts to prevent global denuclearization as well as a nuclear-free Middle East are all part of Washington’s black record of non-compliance with international obligations and disrespect for international mechanisms on global disarmament and security.
The USA has, for all practical purposes, taken the UN Disarmament Conference hostage and is hindering its effective performance in advancing international peace and security. For years now, the USA is opposed to bringing up the issue of disarmament in the UN Disarmament Conference
Refusal by USA to denuclearize Israel clearly shows its own mindset to retain have nuke regime intact.
But the efforts by USA-Israel twins to project Iran as a rogue state are motivated and hence do hold water.
Iran is among the first founders of the UN Disarmament Conference and, Iran says, has always played an instrumental and constructive role in advancing the objectives of the conference, in particular that of nuclear disarmament. Iran has also played a key role in negotiations on international treaties, including the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Iran proposed the idea of a nuke-free Middle East and is among the flag-bearers of nuclear disarmament. Describing Iran as a victim of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the Iranian spokesman said the Islamic Republic of Iran along with other peace-loving nations of the world will continue to tap into all national and international potential to contribute to the creation of a WMD-free world.
The recent remarks by US President B Obama and UK Premier David Cameron about continuing pressure on Iran are discouraging and indicate the lack of a realistic view and the right understanding of reality by those who advocate these pressures. Iran said the policy of pressure had never been effective, adding that purposeful negotiations made with goodwill were the only way to achieve a solution to the Western standoff over Tehran’s nuclear energy program.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry condemned Canada regime for joining anti-Iran rogue states bandwagon led by USA-Israel twins and also condemned the recent remarks by Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird and the holding of an anti-Iran conference in Canada as flagrant interference in the Islamic Republic of Iran’s internal affairs.
Canada’s blame-game in the foreign policy arena, particularly with respect to the Islamic Republic of Iran, will not be able to divert public attention either inside or outside Canada from issues such as the election fraud known as the Robocalls scandal, which brought the current Canadian government to power, or the blatant and systematic violation of human rights in Canada. People around the world have learned about the massive racial discrimination, child trafficking and sex abuse, biased regulations for aborigines and minorities, growing poverty and unemployment among immigrants, racism and xenophobia in Canada, which were all reported by the UN official sources as well as Canada’s non-government organizations. The international community is concerned about democracy and the human rights situation in Canada
The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman further welcomed Egypt’s proposal on forming a quartet on Syria and voiced the Islamic Republic’s readiness to help resolve the crisis in the Arab country.
Anti-Islamism: Opposition in Egypt opposes electoral judgment, democracy!
Opposition in Egypt, backed by western anti-Islamic regimes and their media netwroks, misbehaves with the nation by attacking the popular wishes.
This is a dirty trend because the defeated parties can in any nation now arrange demonstrations to oust the government. If Republicans do the same in USA, there would be chaos in that “democracy” as well as at White House.
Opposition in Egypt behaves not just undemocratic in trying to destabilize the elected government an as well as nation but also anti-Islamic by creating hurdles in new Egyptian regime’s strive to get rid of old system and make it Islamic in a systematic way. People wanted a basic change and want to live as true believers of Islam.
June 30 marks one year since Mohammad Morsi took office and opposition using the demonstrations to pull down his government.
President Mohammed Morsi says he rejects all dictates, whether domestic or foreign.
The popularly elected president made it clear to his enemies that he will not step down and called on the military to withdraw its ultimatum that it will intervene if he does not work out differences with the opposition. The military has said that if no agreement is reached between Morsi and his opponents meeting their demands it will impose its own political road map to resolve the crisis. Its deadline runs out during the day Wednesday.
The military's mission is guarding the borders and securing vital institutions, and that it has no intention to play any other role. Morsi dismissed an apparent threat by the military to both Egypt's president and opposition that it would step in if political fighting descends into chaos, as president's allies prepare for another mass rally in few days to counter June 30 opposition-led demonstrations.
The remarks came a day after Defense Minister Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi gave the nation's Islamist rulers and their opponents a week to reach an understanding before planned June 30 opposition protests demanding resignation of President Mohammed Morsi. El-Sissi issued a toughly worded warning that the military will intervene to stop the nation from entering a "dark tunnel." El-Sissi's statement indicated to Morsi's hard-line backers that the military will step in if protesters are attacked during their demonstrations. Opponents charge that Morsi is monopolizing power for his Muslim Brotherhood, excluding others, while failing to make progress toward solving the country's critical problems, like economic malaise, fuel shortages, electricity blackouts and increasing unemployment. They demand that he step down and hold early presidential elections. "There is a president ruling the country in a democratic way, and (through) democratic elections. We can't imagine that the army would come back," the presidential office said. "The army has one role — protecting the borders and securing the strategic institutions. There is no political role for the army."
Demonstrations have brought a new Islamist regime in Egypt. Endless demonstrations in Egypt may not do any good for people or nation. The regime should be given opportunity and support to govern full term.
A Word
Egypt's oppositon has a duty in not destabilizing the nation. People will punish them if they continue to misbehave.
The CIA-Pentagon duo, supported by all anti-Islamic amalgams, wants Egypt to remain an American puppet regime but the Islamic regime cannot do that against the genuine interests of the nation and Islam.
That is the reason demonstrations by miscreants are taking place in Egypt. Global media’s anti-Islamic mindset is g fuelling the crisis.
President Morsi is being forced by the opposition and its western backers to impose emergency to safeguard nation's sovereignty and democracy.
Islamic party has a primary duty before Islamic faith.
Fascist Israel 1948: Symbol of Zionist state terrorism, occupation and expansionism!
All peace talks have not meant anything significantly while Palestine people continue to face Zionist threat for their survival.
Fascist Israel, backed by its chief promoter USA, has been the cause of disastrous existence of people of Palestine on their own lands. Israel has also succeeded in dividing the Palestinians into virtually two nations along unexplainable lines. Along with Israeli genocides, these two factions, Fatah and Hamas also kill each other.
Enemies of Palestine- Israel-USA terror twins - not just keep laughing at the cruel fate of Palestine people but also plan for future rigorous terror attacks, genocides and expansionism.
Jewish lobbies residing in Washington and controlling US foreign policy just do not let the Fatah-Hamas faction reunite into a single nation. Thus far, pro-west Fatah has been effectively used by USA to attack Hamas faction. Unity between Fatah and Hamas is the key issue for further progress of creation of Palestine state.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is in touch with Arab world to get the Palestine factions reunited and was in Cairo for talks with Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi. Talks scheduled include discussions relating to Palestinian reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah and the recent Arab League visit to Washington where the Israeli-Arab peace process was discussed with Obama administration officials. Representatives of Hamas and Fatah met in Cairo and agreed to hold elections for a unity government within three months.
After occupation of Palestine in 1948, the game plan in Mideast by US-Israel terror twins has been expansionism and genocides in Palestine.
Israel does not seek peace in Mideast and stalls all peace talks. Nuclear Tel-Aviv agreed to partake in peace talks, unwillingly, only by intentional pressure but has managed to make the talks bogus.
Around 1.7 million Palestinians live in Gaza under terror control of Israel, even after the UN granted statehood to the Palestinians. The events of the Arab Spring, which few, if any, predicted, have meant the Palestinian-Israeli issue has been largely sidelined. Obama's famous double speech in Cairo in June 2009 where he was perceived to have reached out to the Arab World turned out to be totally fake.
Bush Jr, or George W Bush's name is generally mud across much of the Arab World. But for Palestinians, Obama has been worse to deal with. And rightly so. Maybe Obama is not worse for the Middle East as a whole. But Obama is deadly disgusting.
Obama has been worse than Bush," one Palestinian official in the West Bank told me not so long ago. It raised an eyebrow.
The failure of the two main Palestinian factions, Fatah in power in parts of the West Bank, and Hamas, which governs in Gaza, to reconcile their differences and speak with one voice.
This has made the Palestinians weak.
Since 1948 Israel has become a strong terror state with hidden Zionist dry ideas, envisaged wars as the key tool to acquire Arab lands. In the more than 40 years since the Middle East war of June 1967, there have been many peace plans and many negotiations. Some of these have been successful, including those between Egypt and Israel and Israel and Jordan, but a settlement has still not been reached in the core conflict - the dispute between the Israelis and Palestinians.
All peace talks, all agreements have so far only benefited Israel in further expanding territories and killing Palestinians as well as obtaining more sophisticated terror goods from the USA and Europe.
Notorious UNSC and NATO controlled by USA shields Zionist crimes against humanity.
ICJ and ICC look the other way as the cold blooded Zionist criminals go on rampage in Palestine.
Here are some of important landmarks in US sponsored peace talks without containing Israeli fascist trends. A peace talks is followed by Israeli attacks on people of Palestine, besieged by terror blockades.
UN Security Council Resolution 242, 1967: Resolution 242 was passed on 22 November 1967 and embodies the principle that has guided most of the subsequent peace plans - the exchange of land for peace. The resolution called for the "withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict", and "respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognised boundaries free from threats or acts of force".
The resolution is famous for the imprecision, in English, of its central phase concerning an Israeli withdrawal - it says simply "from territories". The Israelis said this did not necessarily mean all territories, but Arab negotiators argued that it did. It was written under Chapter VI of the UN Charter, under which Security Council resolutions are recommendations, not under Chapter VII, which means they are orders. Many peace proposals refer to 242. Resolution 338 is usually linked to it. This called for a ceasefire in the war of October 1973 and urged the implementation of 242 "in all its parts".
Camp David Accords, 1978: There were several peace plans following the 1967 war, but nothing happened until after the 1973 Yom Kippur or October War. There followed a new mood for peace, as shown by a historic visit to Jerusalem
Impressum
Verlag: BookRix GmbH & Co. KG
Tag der Veröffentlichung: 19.09.2013
ISBN: 978-3-7309-5037-1
Alle Rechte vorbehalten
Widmung:
Dedicated to my grandmother who helped me study and grow.